Do you believe Karl Rove delete e-mails more or less the firing of the U.S attorneys on catastrophe?
How would you help them find them again?
Answers:
No, but it's a fact that Slick Willey fired 10 times as oodles US attorney's for the sole reason of them being conservatives...
DO YOU BELIEVE ANYTHING THOSE CORRUPT REPUBLICAN F U C K S SAY? I dont believe a word of their deception.
Moot point. Firing those lawyers was no crime. It be no crime because there is no evidence to say it be. To go farther, read this :::::::: Sorry Doesn't Seem to Be the Hardest Word
by Ann Coulter (More by this author)
Posted: 03/28/2007
When will Republicans learn to stop apologizing?
The Bush leadership is embroiled in the most ridiculous non-scandal scandal in human history -- set past its sell-by date when the administration stupidly apologized for firing its own employees.
U.S. attorneys are political appointees who serve at the pleasure of the president. The president may fire them for any judgment at all. That includes not implementing the president's policy more or less criminal prosecutions. It also includes being in the channel of someone else whom the president wants to appoint for patronage reasons.
Why wasn't a fuss made when Bush fired Donald Rumsfeld? He is every bit as much a political appointee as the U.S. attorneys are.
Democrats hold the breathtaking audacity to claim that Bush's replacing his own political appointees is "politicizing prosecutions."
They say this as Sandy Berger walks free after stealing and destroying top-secret national collateral documents -- but Lewis "Scooter" Libby faces decades in prison for not outing a covert agent. (Let's hope he's widely read his lesson!)
They say this as Rep. William "The Refrigerator" Jefferson sits on the Homeland Security Committee while waiting for the $100,000 found in his freezer to dissolve -- but Tom DeLay remains under an indictment by some hick prosecutor in Texas for an alleged accounting contravention.
They say this as Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid draws interest on the sale of a property he sold contained by a complicated land swindle -- but American hero Randy "Duke" Cunningham rots in prison.
They influence this while Sen. Chuck Schumer pays no price whatsoever for his Democratic Senatorial Campaign Committee having illegally obtain a copy of Republican Lt. Gov. Michael Steele's credit report, for which one employee, Lauren Weiner, pleaded guilty, but served no prison time.
They say this while Sen. Teddy Kennedy is still at colossal (and getting larger).
Democrats have created a world in which a DNC card is a "attain out of jail free" card, and "guilt beyond a reasonable doubt" technique "no doubt the defendant is Republican." (If Democrats keep this up, they'll enjoy to rethink their push to give inmates the right to vote.)
Then they turn around and say Republicans are "politicizing prosecutions" by firing their own organization. And all Republicans can do is apologize.
I refuse to parse the inane allegations the Democrats are making, to point out that Clinton's wholesale firing of Republican U.S. attorneys be worse, or to mention that some of these U.S. attorneys should have been fired a long time ago (Carol Lam).
Bush should articulate: "We did it, it was political, and there's nothing you can do more or less it."
Then he should start holding hearings on Congress' obstruction of the period of war effort. Members of Congress should be asked to come before the administration's hearing and testify under oath about their commitment to achievement. If they are not traitors, what do they have to hide? Surely they will be likely to state under oath that they are not undermining the war force for partisan political gain.
The hearings could be televise in prime time: "Traitor or No Traitor?"
The president's investigatory power is better grounded than is Congress'. There is no "hearings and investigations" clause surrounded by Article I, describing Congress' powers, but the Recommendation Clause of Article II, Section 3 obligates the president to "from time to time give to the Congress Information of the State of the Union."
If the State of the Union is that we hold a treasonous majority in Congress that is affirmatively undermining American national guarantee, the president is constitutionally obliged to give Congress information to that effect. How can he gross that judgment without summit the necessary data?
While he's at it, the Bush hearing should look into the Democrats' hiring and firing practices. Were the dedicated staffers who worked on various committees while the Republicans be in control retained by the incoming Democrats? Or were some of those staffers fired because of their (gasp!) taking sides affiliation?
Finally, just for the Democrats' mentioning Randy "Duke" Cunningham's name, Bush should pity him immediately.
Admittedly, in this one armour, the Republican was actually guilty of something. Cunningham took bribes -- he didn't slay a girl at Chappaquiddick. To put it another way, the only item Duke Cunningham ever sank was his own trade.
And in one glorious afternoon over North Vietnam, Duke Cunningham did more for his county than the entire Democratic caucus will do in a lifetime.
The president have absolute authority to fire U.S. attorneys, hold investigative hearings and compromise pardons. What's he worried about? That the medium will be hysterical and Democrats will call him names? Constantly apologizing doesn't seem to be to have worked out too well for him any. How about doing something for the Americans who elected him?
Ah, but I see he has! As we walk to press, news comes across the transom that Bush has withdrawn the nomination of Sam Fox as ambassador to Belgium because Democrats are upset that Fox give a donation to the Swift Boat Veterans for Truth.
There's no hope.
Yeah.
Right.
Sure.
And I believe Nixon's secretary, Rose Mary Woods, who said she had accidentally erased the tape by pushing the wrong foot pedal on her cartridge player while answering the phone, too.
Peace,
Of course not. Rove is a traitor.
When people routinely delete emails, they are still in the history, which they are available. They aren't looking at hand, because if they do, and find it, then they won't have an excuse. If they find it, and are forced to turn it over, they may find out that they be in the wrong, and be in even more trouble.
The elderly adage, 'it's easier to ask for forgiveness, then it is to ask for permission". Think about that. If they lost the emails, "oh, we are sorry, we won't do that again", instead of stonewalling the ancestors trying to get at the truth.
sure...he accidentally deleted over 400 emails...and to be precise the number they claim to be missing...ooops, i hit the delete key....400 times.
ya right.
I have to assume, not knowing him individually, the same as you, that there is the presumption of innocence within this country, assuming you do not suspend all of our rights, and that if he says it be an accident, I have no object to doubt him. Just like I would not doubt that you have personal destruction contained by mind with this "question"
They will never show up. Nothing can take place to Karl. He is busy writing writing McCain speeches now..The repubs have made the declaration this week. Didn't you notice the difference in him at his final speech. And ever wonder who paid for all the protection on his trip to Iraq. Would a democrat gain that attention on a trip here. Yep! Bet on McCain!
Related Questions:
In a Car stroke of luck, Pregnant but not hurt, should i receive a advocate?
An disaster claim have be settled and the legal representative said money would be contained by tomorrow. Now it's not. What's up?
Should I hire a legal representative? I be surrounded by a saloon disaster next to some extenuating circumstances...?
Ideas for Los Angeles auto coincidence attorneys?
I NEED HELP! I own property smash up next to pictures from a sports car happenstance but can't find an attorney?!?
Answers:
No, but it's a fact that Slick Willey fired 10 times as oodles US attorney's for the sole reason of them being conservatives...
DO YOU BELIEVE ANYTHING THOSE CORRUPT REPUBLICAN F U C K S SAY? I dont believe a word of their deception.
Moot point. Firing those lawyers was no crime. It be no crime because there is no evidence to say it be. To go farther, read this :::::::: Sorry Doesn't Seem to Be the Hardest Word
by Ann Coulter (More by this author)
Posted: 03/28/2007
When will Republicans learn to stop apologizing?
The Bush leadership is embroiled in the most ridiculous non-scandal scandal in human history -- set past its sell-by date when the administration stupidly apologized for firing its own employees.
U.S. attorneys are political appointees who serve at the pleasure of the president. The president may fire them for any judgment at all. That includes not implementing the president's policy more or less criminal prosecutions. It also includes being in the channel of someone else whom the president wants to appoint for patronage reasons.
Why wasn't a fuss made when Bush fired Donald Rumsfeld? He is every bit as much a political appointee as the U.S. attorneys are.
Democrats hold the breathtaking audacity to claim that Bush's replacing his own political appointees is "politicizing prosecutions."
They say this as Sandy Berger walks free after stealing and destroying top-secret national collateral documents -- but Lewis "Scooter" Libby faces decades in prison for not outing a covert agent. (Let's hope he's widely read his lesson!)
They say this as Rep. William "The Refrigerator" Jefferson sits on the Homeland Security Committee while waiting for the $100,000 found in his freezer to dissolve -- but Tom DeLay remains under an indictment by some hick prosecutor in Texas for an alleged accounting contravention.
They say this as Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid draws interest on the sale of a property he sold contained by a complicated land swindle -- but American hero Randy "Duke" Cunningham rots in prison.
They influence this while Sen. Chuck Schumer pays no price whatsoever for his Democratic Senatorial Campaign Committee having illegally obtain a copy of Republican Lt. Gov. Michael Steele's credit report, for which one employee, Lauren Weiner, pleaded guilty, but served no prison time.
They say this while Sen. Teddy Kennedy is still at colossal (and getting larger).
Democrats have created a world in which a DNC card is a "attain out of jail free" card, and "guilt beyond a reasonable doubt" technique "no doubt the defendant is Republican." (If Democrats keep this up, they'll enjoy to rethink their push to give inmates the right to vote.)
Then they turn around and say Republicans are "politicizing prosecutions" by firing their own organization. And all Republicans can do is apologize.
I refuse to parse the inane allegations the Democrats are making, to point out that Clinton's wholesale firing of Republican U.S. attorneys be worse, or to mention that some of these U.S. attorneys should have been fired a long time ago (Carol Lam).
Bush should articulate: "We did it, it was political, and there's nothing you can do more or less it."
Then he should start holding hearings on Congress' obstruction of the period of war effort. Members of Congress should be asked to come before the administration's hearing and testify under oath about their commitment to achievement. If they are not traitors, what do they have to hide? Surely they will be likely to state under oath that they are not undermining the war force for partisan political gain.
The hearings could be televise in prime time: "Traitor or No Traitor?"
The president's investigatory power is better grounded than is Congress'. There is no "hearings and investigations" clause surrounded by Article I, describing Congress' powers, but the Recommendation Clause of Article II, Section 3 obligates the president to "from time to time give to the Congress Information of the State of the Union."
If the State of the Union is that we hold a treasonous majority in Congress that is affirmatively undermining American national guarantee, the president is constitutionally obliged to give Congress information to that effect. How can he gross that judgment without summit the necessary data?
While he's at it, the Bush hearing should look into the Democrats' hiring and firing practices. Were the dedicated staffers who worked on various committees while the Republicans be in control retained by the incoming Democrats? Or were some of those staffers fired because of their (gasp!) taking sides affiliation?
Finally, just for the Democrats' mentioning Randy "Duke" Cunningham's name, Bush should pity him immediately.
Admittedly, in this one armour, the Republican was actually guilty of something. Cunningham took bribes -- he didn't slay a girl at Chappaquiddick. To put it another way, the only item Duke Cunningham ever sank was his own trade.
And in one glorious afternoon over North Vietnam, Duke Cunningham did more for his county than the entire Democratic caucus will do in a lifetime.
The president have absolute authority to fire U.S. attorneys, hold investigative hearings and compromise pardons. What's he worried about? That the medium will be hysterical and Democrats will call him names? Constantly apologizing doesn't seem to be to have worked out too well for him any. How about doing something for the Americans who elected him?
Ah, but I see he has! As we walk to press, news comes across the transom that Bush has withdrawn the nomination of Sam Fox as ambassador to Belgium because Democrats are upset that Fox give a donation to the Swift Boat Veterans for Truth.
There's no hope.
Yeah.
Right.
Sure.
And I believe Nixon's secretary, Rose Mary Woods, who said she had accidentally erased the tape by pushing the wrong foot pedal on her cartridge player while answering the phone, too.
Peace,
Of course not. Rove is a traitor.
When people routinely delete emails, they are still in the history, which they are available. They aren't looking at hand, because if they do, and find it, then they won't have an excuse. If they find it, and are forced to turn it over, they may find out that they be in the wrong, and be in even more trouble.
The elderly adage, 'it's easier to ask for forgiveness, then it is to ask for permission". Think about that. If they lost the emails, "oh, we are sorry, we won't do that again", instead of stonewalling the ancestors trying to get at the truth.
sure...he accidentally deleted over 400 emails...and to be precise the number they claim to be missing...ooops, i hit the delete key....400 times.
ya right.
I have to assume, not knowing him individually, the same as you, that there is the presumption of innocence within this country, assuming you do not suspend all of our rights, and that if he says it be an accident, I have no object to doubt him. Just like I would not doubt that you have personal destruction contained by mind with this "question"
They will never show up. Nothing can take place to Karl. He is busy writing writing McCain speeches now..The repubs have made the declaration this week. Didn't you notice the difference in him at his final speech. And ever wonder who paid for all the protection on his trip to Iraq. Would a democrat gain that attention on a trip here. Yep! Bet on McCain!
Related Questions: