Why do liberals other run to the defense of the criminals?
Many liberals in Philly are blaming the cops for chasing these criminals who caused this:
http://www.philly.com/philly/news/homepa…
My quiz is why these career criminals (ages 18 and 20) are still on the streets. Is this because of some liberal demonstrator judge?
Answers:
because 'birds of a plume, flock together'
The article looks similar to the police weren't in pursuit of the criminals. If they had be, then yes, the public should be concerned because the police should be concerned about serving and protecting the greater obedient of public safety. If that means not pursuing down residential neighborhoods and waiting for a better opportunity to return with the bad guy, then that's what they should do.
As for why those kids be on the streets, it sounds like a peacemaker had already issued a warrant. So, it's because the police hadn't caught them yet. And 13 arrests doesn't kind you a carreer criminal. We don't know what those arrests were for.
Because they feel that thses poor criminals be "forced" into their lives of crime. It wasn't their choice. So they are seeking out to punish the people who try and stop them. Liberals truly are a dangerous bunch. I wonder how doomed to failure they would feel for those criminals if they broke into their house, stole their car, assaulted their wife, etc...
violent youth are turned loose dispossessed of america every day because somewhere along the line some contard settled it was more important to maintain potheads locked away for simple possession and chose to grant parole or probation to the hard core criminals instead.
(hey, it's more predictable that then the "liberal activist" scenario you ranted in the order of briefly.)
Like attracts like ?
Innocent until proven guilty in this country.
Until the right dismantles that law, you should come and call on and check out how our Constitution works.
If you study American law, you will see that the laws against criminals are designed to protect everyone.
They don't always. Steal one of their cars or get rid of them some bad drugs and they are all over you.
You mean criminals approaching G.W. Bush, Dick Cheney, Karl Rove, Newt Gingrich, Don Rumsfeld...etc.? I consider myself to be a liberal but I don't defend these guys. Fox does.
They are "excuse makers" for anyone who has an issue (unless you begin to be a Conservative or a Republican. They will overlook faults and crimes if they think it will benefit them contained by any way. As far as the career criminals, they blame it on their upbringing, their environment, the certainty that they had less than someone else or anything they can come up with. It has worked and nearby are so many liberal judges individual appointed who overlook the actual law and turn criminals back without a roof over your head to do more damage. The same group of non-thinkers are the ones who blame guns for crimes and go after those who own them officially and without any criminal activity involvement to some extent than recognize that criminals get guns without permission and use them in crimes: guns don't kill ancestors; criminals do!! It is hard to fight this problem when the Dems and Libs are surrounded by charge and don't give a hoot for the law (look a adjectives of them who are serving in decision making positions surrounded by government who are breaking laws and are given a overhaul!) In order to make the CHANGE we want, we must boot out the stuff and vote for people who actually respect the ruling and abide by it. That would not be Obama, Pelosi, Reid, Frank and many, many others who are not looking out for the nation, the Country or the freedoms we once knew. I want my America back; I don't appreciate the Socialist agenda contained by any way!!
Liberals favor political correctness over facts.
How do you know they're liberals?
Police chases often end similar to this. Sometimes it's just not worth the chase.
They aren't defending the criminals. They're questioning the police ruling to chase them through the streets.
they blame social inequalities
While I wouldn't be snatched to call it "liberals always run[ning] to the defense of the criminals", it is disgusting that two ethnic group who are this young have 13 arrests against them and all the same are still on the streets.
For the same reason they don't work.
You're an not conversant troll.
liberals do not support criminals bush & cheney, so once again you are WRONG.
Related Questions:
Criminal defense insurance?
An aggressor cannot claim the right of private defense within criminal law'.explain the stateme.?
What is the lawful rationale for agreed court defenses against or excuss from criminal responsibility?
Can the accuse be charged near perjury if his defense against a criminal charge is proven wrong?
What is your prospect on the insanity defense? Should we hold mentally not a hundred percent criminals fully responsible for their a
http://www.philly.com/philly/news/homepa…
My quiz is why these career criminals (ages 18 and 20) are still on the streets. Is this because of some liberal demonstrator judge?
Answers:
because 'birds of a plume, flock together'
The article looks similar to the police weren't in pursuit of the criminals. If they had be, then yes, the public should be concerned because the police should be concerned about serving and protecting the greater obedient of public safety. If that means not pursuing down residential neighborhoods and waiting for a better opportunity to return with the bad guy, then that's what they should do.
As for why those kids be on the streets, it sounds like a peacemaker had already issued a warrant. So, it's because the police hadn't caught them yet. And 13 arrests doesn't kind you a carreer criminal. We don't know what those arrests were for.
Because they feel that thses poor criminals be "forced" into their lives of crime. It wasn't their choice. So they are seeking out to punish the people who try and stop them. Liberals truly are a dangerous bunch. I wonder how doomed to failure they would feel for those criminals if they broke into their house, stole their car, assaulted their wife, etc...
violent youth are turned loose dispossessed of america every day because somewhere along the line some contard settled it was more important to maintain potheads locked away for simple possession and chose to grant parole or probation to the hard core criminals instead.
(hey, it's more predictable that then the "liberal activist" scenario you ranted in the order of briefly.)
Like attracts like ?
Innocent until proven guilty in this country.
Until the right dismantles that law, you should come and call on and check out how our Constitution works.
If you study American law, you will see that the laws against criminals are designed to protect everyone.
They don't always. Steal one of their cars or get rid of them some bad drugs and they are all over you.
You mean criminals approaching G.W. Bush, Dick Cheney, Karl Rove, Newt Gingrich, Don Rumsfeld...etc.? I consider myself to be a liberal but I don't defend these guys. Fox does.
They are "excuse makers" for anyone who has an issue (unless you begin to be a Conservative or a Republican. They will overlook faults and crimes if they think it will benefit them contained by any way. As far as the career criminals, they blame it on their upbringing, their environment, the certainty that they had less than someone else or anything they can come up with. It has worked and nearby are so many liberal judges individual appointed who overlook the actual law and turn criminals back without a roof over your head to do more damage. The same group of non-thinkers are the ones who blame guns for crimes and go after those who own them officially and without any criminal activity involvement to some extent than recognize that criminals get guns without permission and use them in crimes: guns don't kill ancestors; criminals do!! It is hard to fight this problem when the Dems and Libs are surrounded by charge and don't give a hoot for the law (look a adjectives of them who are serving in decision making positions surrounded by government who are breaking laws and are given a overhaul!) In order to make the CHANGE we want, we must boot out the stuff and vote for people who actually respect the ruling and abide by it. That would not be Obama, Pelosi, Reid, Frank and many, many others who are not looking out for the nation, the Country or the freedoms we once knew. I want my America back; I don't appreciate the Socialist agenda contained by any way!!
Liberals favor political correctness over facts.
How do you know they're liberals?
Police chases often end similar to this. Sometimes it's just not worth the chase.
They aren't defending the criminals. They're questioning the police ruling to chase them through the streets.
they blame social inequalities
While I wouldn't be snatched to call it "liberals always run[ning] to the defense of the criminals", it is disgusting that two ethnic group who are this young have 13 arrests against them and all the same are still on the streets.
For the same reason they don't work.
You're an not conversant troll.
liberals do not support criminals bush & cheney, so once again you are WRONG.
Related Questions: