If a personage beside a criminal history uses a endorsed firearm (for home defense), what will arise?
Scenario: John is temporarily living with Steve (his brother-in-law) and his family. John have a criminal record and did a short strecth at the Graybar Hotel. Steve legally owns a shotgun. In a home defense situation, can John use the shotgun for defending the own flesh and blood and not face trouble with the Law?
Answers:
No, as a felon John is irrelevant to possess firearms.*
depending on the law surrounded by the State where " john" is living circumstances could be different,but technically anyone beside a criminal history is not suppose to be in possession of a fire arm. This is a violation of their probation/parole agreement. But the biggest entity though is they would want to know why " john " was living in a house where on earth there was a set fire arm in the first place. So they may ask some tough questions around why they where living in the house within the first place but given the circumstance they may and I say "may" not revoke johns probation/parole.
Probably would be charged beside possession of a fire arm by a convicted felon but hey I am sure the judge and or jury would take this into consideration and own some leniency and time served would be better than being dealt a extermination sentence.
He would probably be no billed by the Grand Jury on using a gun for protection but John would probably be indicted on possession of a firearm by a felon. Then probably reduced to a misd. or something along that line. Source(s): 15 yrs Law Enforcment
John is past the worst if its definitely defense.... depending on where he lives.
As long as there is a witness that he defended himself i think he shouldn't catch in trouble (A witness who's not a member of the family). Source(s): Future Law Student.
Can John use the gun to protect his family and not face trouble beside the law? If John is a convicted felon whose civil rights have not be restored then the answer is no. John possessed the gun around the point in time where on earth he holds it. It is illegal for John, as a convicted felon, to possess guns. Therefore, he COULD face trouble next to the law..
snuff them all, let god sort them out Source(s): devine insperation
If the firearm is legally owned, he should be fine as long as adjectives other requirements for home defense are fulfilled. He may have his background brought up at a trial, but it really shouldn't concern in this instance. This is especially true since his previous conviction must not have be a felony since he owns the firearm legally.
Related Questions:
Should a man spank a feminine criminal for self defense?
Is it true that mental infection is considered a defense contained by criminal court?
Where can I return with criminal defense forms for illinois?
If GITMO is officially recognized and generous, why lurk more than 5 years for the first trial or defense of suspected criminals?
A sound out for criminal defense attornies?
Answers:
No, as a felon John is irrelevant to possess firearms.*
depending on the law surrounded by the State where " john" is living circumstances could be different,but technically anyone beside a criminal history is not suppose to be in possession of a fire arm. This is a violation of their probation/parole agreement. But the biggest entity though is they would want to know why " john " was living in a house where on earth there was a set fire arm in the first place. So they may ask some tough questions around why they where living in the house within the first place but given the circumstance they may and I say "may" not revoke johns probation/parole.
Probably would be charged beside possession of a fire arm by a convicted felon but hey I am sure the judge and or jury would take this into consideration and own some leniency and time served would be better than being dealt a extermination sentence.
He would probably be no billed by the Grand Jury on using a gun for protection but John would probably be indicted on possession of a firearm by a felon. Then probably reduced to a misd. or something along that line. Source(s): 15 yrs Law Enforcment
John is past the worst if its definitely defense.... depending on where he lives.
As long as there is a witness that he defended himself i think he shouldn't catch in trouble (A witness who's not a member of the family). Source(s): Future Law Student.
Can John use the gun to protect his family and not face trouble beside the law? If John is a convicted felon whose civil rights have not be restored then the answer is no. John possessed the gun around the point in time where on earth he holds it. It is illegal for John, as a convicted felon, to possess guns. Therefore, he COULD face trouble next to the law..
snuff them all, let god sort them out Source(s): devine insperation
If the firearm is legally owned, he should be fine as long as adjectives other requirements for home defense are fulfilled. He may have his background brought up at a trial, but it really shouldn't concern in this instance. This is especially true since his previous conviction must not have be a felony since he owns the firearm legally.
Related Questions: