Do you focus that the self-defense decree is over-protecting the criminals?

Say, If you had a million dollar in a house and two ancestors are stealing it and taking off as you go into your house. Do you really want to follow the regulation and call the police/run after them since they are leaving beside your property? or do you shoot their heads off and protect your a million dollar?
Answers:
Your grammar is hard to follow. I'm not sure what you are asking.
I would run over them and tell the police that the guys jump in front of my car while I be driving on my lawn. They would immediately budge to the morgue. Sorry. I work too hard for what I've got and it's not much.
The guns are for your protection...not necessarily for your possesions protection. Shooting their head off? You can shoot them here in Texas but I don't feel it would be right to try and kill them. Just shooting at them if they are unarmed is enough to brand most people flee.
i would feel similar to shooting them. but i dont think stealing deserves dying. if you have a million dollar home your are probably paying for some honest insurance anyway.
We bend over backwards within this country for our citizens. We don't want any of them to be punished unless we're absolutely sure they're guilty.

It's called "freedom". You know, the undamaged "presumption of innocence" thing...
You beckon police and attempt to detain them. You don't kill them.



Related Questions:
  • I want a internet article concerning a criminal trial which includes the use of affirmative defenses , etc.?
  • Whats the best proposal for someone taking the stand within near on defense at a criminal trial?
  • An aggressor cannot claim the right of private defense within criminal law'.explain the stateme.?
  • In a criminal trial is it wrong for a witness for the defense to gossip to the prosecutor?
  • Name the (3) category for defenses criminal equality?