Who tend to be better: the prosecutor or the free defense attorney the state entitles you to?
Answers:
Well, in my county, deputy PD's are remunerated about 15% more than equivalent level deputy DA's, and there's a waiting detail for people applying to move from the DA's office to the PD's. (In reality, the DA's office just dodged a strike by their assistant DA's over low pay)
Richard
Well think of it resembling this, that defense attorney is being paid by impossible to tell apart people that are paying the prosecutor.
WELL IN MY EXPERIENCE , THE PROSECUTER AND THE FREE DEFENSE ATTORNEY ARE BOTH EMPLOYED BY THE STATE AND THEY BOTH ARE WORKING TOGETHER. CONSPIRE Source(s): PERSONAL EXPERIENCE
I can't recount you how many times that as an attorney (private) I have explained to culture they have a right to the public defender and they say aloud, "no, I want a lawyer". The public defender IS a lawyer. And, tolerate me tell you, that as far as the ones I know, they can be really good.
All job have people who are lousy at their job. I know many private attorneys who are lousy. I would just volunteer this in defense of Pd's. They are in court adjectives the time, therefore they have a great deal more experience than most private attorneys. They know the judge they work with exceptionally well and that is exalted in determining what stratagy you might take. They know the DA's and know how far they can be pushed. For example, I work beside a DA who if I don't like a deal I set for trial. Even on the worst overnight case possible. Because I know that the day before trial he is going to ask me what I want to fashion the trial go away....I know that will happen because though I am a private attorney, I work within my court room every day and I know he will cave.
Pd's enjoy a lot of resources private attorney's don't. They have books full of motions, up to date info on the Supreme Ct. decision, access to the computer law search programs for free whereas it costs a fortune for private attorneys to own it.
PD's are lawyers who take their brief seriously, otherwise they wouldn't be in that position. But they are overwhelmed and even with secretaries etc., they are overworked.
DA's for the most slice are trying to do their job to the best of their ability. It's in recent times that they don't have any ability! NO...basically joking.
The DA's I work with are basically like people contained by every job. They believe in what they are doing, but habitually hit a brick wall in trying to accomplish the goal. They own bosses who tell them what they can offer and what they can't. They hold laws that say the target must be consulted and most often the victim want the entity "prosecuted to the fullest extent of the law". They have the public looking over their shoulders telling them they better put ancestors away cause they don't want their home invaded or family hurt....but at the same time, those people won't reimburse for the resources necessary to make a difference or provide a place for the criminal to be in motion.
They also have to deal beside sloppy police work, bad witnesses (like the stoner who saw everything...explain to a jury why they should believe this drug addict), victims who are unsypathetic (like a drug dealer who be shot and you are prosecuting the shooter....jury's say Yea! He deserved it... yet he be a victim.)
There are the DA's who come to a plea bargain wanting a plea, but forgetting near has to be a bargain for us to agree. But for the most section I believe they are people truly wanting to make a difference and to protect society.
the free defense attorneys are mostly unexperienced young law grads who of late want to to make their groove.
Related Questions: