Can someone describe the motives of the prosecutor and the defense attorney contained by passage arguments?
Can someone describe the motives of the prosecutor and the defense attorney in opening arguments?Thanks!
Answers:
Obviously the motive of the prosecutor is to prove the perpetrator is guilty beyond a shadow of a doubt. Proving it by the evidence that is given . The defense attorney is hired or if the accuse doesn't have the money for a lawyer,he/she is given a court-appointed attorney. The defense advocate also has to prove the innocence of his client given the details and evidence or lack sour to the appeal of the jury and/or the judge. From the opening statements they both will attempt and describe the defendent and the charges against him or her and then go on to try to prove their satchel beyond a reasonable doubt. They appeal to the judge and to a jury if present.
Opening arguments are to set the stage for what they intend to do in the defense and/or prosecution contained by the specific case.
So they can get the jury within the frame of mind they want to be able to convince them of their point of evidence.
the passage arguments by both sides are to outline what they will prove during the case. They give a inexact outline of how they intend to do this. they outline evidence, witnesses, timelines, and they try to give a view as to the defendants/arrestees for doing or not doing something in need creating too much expectation for their side but the opposite for the other side. Source(s): n.
Related Questions:
Defense Lawyers...Are you appreciative that JESUS pardonned a murderrer on the cross?
Does defense attorney have need of to seize consent from client to reset court date because prosecutor unawares?
Does anyone know a honourable defense attorney around Southern Illinois?
Defense Attorney Ethics?
Are defense attorneys ethical?
Answers:
Obviously the motive of the prosecutor is to prove the perpetrator is guilty beyond a shadow of a doubt. Proving it by the evidence that is given . The defense attorney is hired or if the accuse doesn't have the money for a lawyer,he/she is given a court-appointed attorney. The defense advocate also has to prove the innocence of his client given the details and evidence or lack sour to the appeal of the jury and/or the judge. From the opening statements they both will attempt and describe the defendent and the charges against him or her and then go on to try to prove their satchel beyond a reasonable doubt. They appeal to the judge and to a jury if present.
Opening arguments are to set the stage for what they intend to do in the defense and/or prosecution contained by the specific case.
So they can get the jury within the frame of mind they want to be able to convince them of their point of evidence.
the passage arguments by both sides are to outline what they will prove during the case. They give a inexact outline of how they intend to do this. they outline evidence, witnesses, timelines, and they try to give a view as to the defendants/arrestees for doing or not doing something in need creating too much expectation for their side but the opposite for the other side. Source(s): n.
Related Questions: