Question nearly defense attorney and prosecuting attorney?
How does a defense lawyer,
prove that their client did not
understand that what he or she did be a crime
at the time or that he or she did not know
that the actions were wrong?
How does a prosecuting advocate,
prove that the accused did
understand that what he or she did be a crime
at the time or that he or she did know
that the actions were wrong?
"> The chief issue is what is known as reasonable doubt. A defense advocate has to prove to a judge or a jury that their client is innocent base on reasonable doubt. It depends on the case and the situation, it is intricate to defend someone who has be caught dealing cocaine to an undercover cop. But it is possible to win a case where a personality is charged with a crime but there is evidence to prove that they may or may not enjoy been there.
Prosecutors hold to eliminate that reasonable doubt from the defense.
Each grip is different and proving that someone did not know it was a crime is difficult to defend. Source(s): Equal Justice Under Law
first things first...prosecutor doesn't enjoy to....they have to prove that a: a crime was committed and b: the accuse did it.then a defense lawyer get a psychiatrist to say so..
Related Questions:
I call for minister to finding a Defense attorney within Maryland for a civil crust surrounded by DC Superior Court . Please Help?
Any1 know three ethical obligation of a defense attorney&three ethical obligation of a prosecuting attorney?
What defense campaign will OJ's Dream Team of lawyer involve to come up near when .?
Suggested glorious academy classes for a defense attorney hopeful?
If a Defense Attorney know his client is guilty, how do they argue for a non-guilty judgment surrounded by trial?
prove that their client did not
understand that what he or she did be a crime
at the time or that he or she did not know
that the actions were wrong?
How does a prosecuting advocate,
prove that the accused did
understand that what he or she did be a crime
at the time or that he or she did know
that the actions were wrong?
"> The chief issue is what is known as reasonable doubt. A defense advocate has to prove to a judge or a jury that their client is innocent base on reasonable doubt. It depends on the case and the situation, it is intricate to defend someone who has be caught dealing cocaine to an undercover cop. But it is possible to win a case where a personality is charged with a crime but there is evidence to prove that they may or may not enjoy been there.
Prosecutors hold to eliminate that reasonable doubt from the defense.
Each grip is different and proving that someone did not know it was a crime is difficult to defend. Source(s): Equal Justice Under Law
first things first...prosecutor doesn't enjoy to....they have to prove that a: a crime was committed and b: the accuse did it.then a defense lawyer get a psychiatrist to say so..
Related Questions: