If you be Eliot Spitzer's defense legal representative how to preserve him against charges that he violated the Mann feat?
One of the possible criminal charges against Eliot Spitzer is that he violated The Mann act.
The Mann act make it a crime to transport anyone across state lines for the purposes of Prostitution.
Eliot Spitzer paid to have the Prostitute set by her pseudonym "Kristen" travel from New York to Washington DC for the purpose of engaging in the stroke of Prostitution.
How would you defend Eliot Spitzer against this charge if you were the defense attorney for Eliot Spitzer?
Answers:
I'd do it like Jack Johnson the boxer. First I'd find a guy within the minor leaugues who looked like Spitzer. Than I'd dress that guy up like Spitzer contained by Spitzer's clothing and send him off contained by a limo so no one can see his face but so journalists will follow the impostor without knowing it. Then I would serenely encourage my client to jump bail and depart from the country. Once out of the country it would be imperative for Spitzer to beat someone up - "hopefully" someone of another race. It adjectives makes sense. Source(s): Jack Johnson is a Dandy
Well you would own to be a good liar, or a in a hurry talker for sure!!
Good one!
I am applying to directive schools right now. I hope to be permitted to law school and be contained by law school this fall over.
I would attack two points. First that Eliot Spitzer did not transport the woman.
Second i would challenge the notion that she was occupied in the act of prostitution.
With respect to transportation: the woman get to Washington DC on her own. Eliot Spitzer did not transport her there.
Eliot Spitzer did not put her in his motor. Eliot Spitzer did not put her on a bus. Eliot Spitzer did not put her on a train. Eliot Spitzer did not put her on a plane.
How did Eliot Spitzer transport her there? The answer is: Eliot Spitzer did not transport her there.
"Kristin" transported herself to Washington DC.
If someone did transport "Kristin" to Washington DC it be not Eliot Spitzer.
If Eliot Spitzer did not transport her to Washington DC, Eliot Spitzer cannot possibly be in violation of the Mann exploit.
I would also attack the question of whether or not "Kristin" was out of stock in the act of prostitution near Eliot Spitzer although based on the facts that I have see reported so far, I think that would be more of a challenge.
Again, you would require that an perform of sex in exchange for money ever took place to prove Prostitution.
I suppose I would challenge the prosecution to prove that an achievement of sex even took place.
What proof would the prosecution have? Did they have video cameras within the room where the act of sex is supposed to hold taken place? Did they have undercover agents watching through peepholes?
Of course it is possible that they will know how to make the woman testify against Eliot Spitzer.
I would challenge her nouns on the basis that she is guilty of many other crimes and is lying because the prosecution have offered her leniency if she testifies against Eliot Spitzer.
The prosecution will reply with the recordings of Eliot Spitzer that they made. I would resist those as illegal and inadmissable.
Also the Prosecution will respond with the proof of the exchange of money.
I would goad their proof that an exchange of money took place and more importantly I would challenge that the act of sex i.e. required to establish the act of Prostitution never took place.
How did I do. Did I pass my exam professor?
quit
Related Questions:
Would you a bit be a defense advocate or prosecuting attorney?
How to be a defense attorney and prepare and argument?
Legal and Ethical Obliagtions of Defense Attorneys?
How much does a private defense attorney engender a year?
Why do defense attorneys maintain population when they know 100% that they are guilty?
The Mann act make it a crime to transport anyone across state lines for the purposes of Prostitution.
Eliot Spitzer paid to have the Prostitute set by her pseudonym "Kristen" travel from New York to Washington DC for the purpose of engaging in the stroke of Prostitution.
How would you defend Eliot Spitzer against this charge if you were the defense attorney for Eliot Spitzer?
Answers:
I'd do it like Jack Johnson the boxer. First I'd find a guy within the minor leaugues who looked like Spitzer. Than I'd dress that guy up like Spitzer contained by Spitzer's clothing and send him off contained by a limo so no one can see his face but so journalists will follow the impostor without knowing it. Then I would serenely encourage my client to jump bail and depart from the country. Once out of the country it would be imperative for Spitzer to beat someone up - "hopefully" someone of another race. It adjectives makes sense. Source(s): Jack Johnson is a Dandy
Well you would own to be a good liar, or a in a hurry talker for sure!!
Good one!
I am applying to directive schools right now. I hope to be permitted to law school and be contained by law school this fall over.
I would attack two points. First that Eliot Spitzer did not transport the woman.
Second i would challenge the notion that she was occupied in the act of prostitution.
With respect to transportation: the woman get to Washington DC on her own. Eliot Spitzer did not transport her there.
Eliot Spitzer did not put her in his motor. Eliot Spitzer did not put her on a bus. Eliot Spitzer did not put her on a train. Eliot Spitzer did not put her on a plane.
How did Eliot Spitzer transport her there? The answer is: Eliot Spitzer did not transport her there.
"Kristin" transported herself to Washington DC.
If someone did transport "Kristin" to Washington DC it be not Eliot Spitzer.
If Eliot Spitzer did not transport her to Washington DC, Eliot Spitzer cannot possibly be in violation of the Mann exploit.
I would also attack the question of whether or not "Kristin" was out of stock in the act of prostitution near Eliot Spitzer although based on the facts that I have see reported so far, I think that would be more of a challenge.
Again, you would require that an perform of sex in exchange for money ever took place to prove Prostitution.
I suppose I would challenge the prosecution to prove that an achievement of sex even took place.
What proof would the prosecution have? Did they have video cameras within the room where the act of sex is supposed to hold taken place? Did they have undercover agents watching through peepholes?
Of course it is possible that they will know how to make the woman testify against Eliot Spitzer.
I would challenge her nouns on the basis that she is guilty of many other crimes and is lying because the prosecution have offered her leniency if she testifies against Eliot Spitzer.
The prosecution will reply with the recordings of Eliot Spitzer that they made. I would resist those as illegal and inadmissable.
Also the Prosecution will respond with the proof of the exchange of money.
I would goad their proof that an exchange of money took place and more importantly I would challenge that the act of sex i.e. required to establish the act of Prostitution never took place.
How did I do. Did I pass my exam professor?
quit
Related Questions: