Lawyers and Paralegals, is this an error on my divorce docket? Please read for details?
Please read this and tell me if Atty. Laxton (all names changed below)
erred. He is NOT my attorney. He is my spouse's attorney. Is this an issue that the peacemaker may question. My attorney, Baxter filed the motion to dismiss on my behalf. My spouse's attorney Laxton file the opposition and it looks like it be done on my behalf. That's bogus.
Please tell me what you think.
YES, I've asked my lawyer. We are in two different neighboring states. It is not a question of IF we will divorce and agree on custody. Jurisdiction red tape is all that is to say holding things up. (Going broke waiting for little points to be hammered out! AAaargh...)
Thank you. Here it is... (from the online county court docket)
02/18/2009 Sean PERKINS BRIEF IN OPPOSITION TO MTN TO DISMISS. Ronald Laxton
02/11/2009 D1 MO D1 Sean PERKINS MOTION TO DISMISS CASE.. Marvin BAXTER
01/13/2009 N/A SR HEARING SCHEDULED, NOTICE(S) SENT
01/13/2009 N/A SC COMPLAINT FOR DIVORCE SET FOR 02/23/2010 AT 09:30 IN CRTRM 4 BEFORE JUDGE KAYLEN O'LEARY. MO.# 55555 FILED ON
11/19/2008 MOTION FOR TEMPORARY RESTRAINING ORDER
12/31/2008 D1 SR SUMS COMPLAINT(555555) SENT BY REGULAR MAIL SERVICE. TO: Sean PERKINS 123 Main East Cinc, IL 55555-0000 ANSWER DATE: 01/28/2009
Thanks for your time, care and expertise, free as you would expect.
Answers:
I own no knowledge of these matters
You could address to a 3rd of 4th year law student, at your nearest university or legal aide
What do you deem is an error? It doesn't look like he filed anything on your behalf. It looks similar to he's doing his job for his client. Why are you looking at the docket searching for mistakes anyway?
The lawyers are each doing their post. They file motions based on the title of the motion, not on whom they are representing. It's done this style in an attempt to keep the court annals in order.
Related Questions:
Who is the best divorce attorney contained by intermediate pennsylvania (harrisburg, PA)?
Divorce,legal representative?
Looking for a worthy attorney contained by the Milwaukee nouns - exspouse isn't adhere to the divorce lingo.?
Could anyone refer me to a cheaper divorce attorney contained by massachusetts. its straightforward, no kids or assets..?
Need a divorce advocate base within bangalore?
erred. He is NOT my attorney. He is my spouse's attorney. Is this an issue that the peacemaker may question. My attorney, Baxter filed the motion to dismiss on my behalf. My spouse's attorney Laxton file the opposition and it looks like it be done on my behalf. That's bogus.
Please tell me what you think.
YES, I've asked my lawyer. We are in two different neighboring states. It is not a question of IF we will divorce and agree on custody. Jurisdiction red tape is all that is to say holding things up. (Going broke waiting for little points to be hammered out! AAaargh...)
Thank you. Here it is... (from the online county court docket)
02/18/2009 Sean PERKINS BRIEF IN OPPOSITION TO MTN TO DISMISS. Ronald Laxton
02/11/2009 D1 MO D1 Sean PERKINS MOTION TO DISMISS CASE.. Marvin BAXTER
01/13/2009 N/A SR HEARING SCHEDULED, NOTICE(S) SENT
01/13/2009 N/A SC COMPLAINT FOR DIVORCE SET FOR 02/23/2010 AT 09:30 IN CRTRM 4 BEFORE JUDGE KAYLEN O'LEARY. MO.# 55555 FILED ON
11/19/2008 MOTION FOR TEMPORARY RESTRAINING ORDER
12/31/2008 D1 SR SUMS COMPLAINT(555555) SENT BY REGULAR MAIL SERVICE. TO: Sean PERKINS 123 Main East Cinc, IL 55555-0000 ANSWER DATE: 01/28/2009
Thanks for your time, care and expertise, free as you would expect.
Answers:
I own no knowledge of these matters
You could address to a 3rd of 4th year law student, at your nearest university or legal aide
What do you deem is an error? It doesn't look like he filed anything on your behalf. It looks similar to he's doing his job for his client. Why are you looking at the docket searching for mistakes anyway?
The lawyers are each doing their post. They file motions based on the title of the motion, not on whom they are representing. It's done this style in an attempt to keep the court annals in order.
Related Questions: