Can i claim compensation for my sons whiplash injury?
Hi my son is 13, he did something very stupid last week he tried to steal a dvd from a shop,he get caught and taken to the police station.
On the way to the station the police van was involved surrounded by an accident, when we were allowed to see him some time subsequent he said he was ok,just a bit shaken up. The subsequent day his neck be stiff and sore so we took him to the hospital and he has whiplash.
Now i realise he shouldnt of been stealing, and if he hadnt he wouldnt of get hurt, but the fact is he made a stupid mistake(he has never be in trouble before) and i am wondering if i should just put it down to experience or see a solicitor.
what do you deliberate?
Answers:
The stealing is a separate matter, so I don't fathom out why many feel the want to bring it up.
We have all stolen something at one time or another, even if its a short time ago a rubber-band or Biro from the office.
You have a lawful claim either from the police or the other driver dependant on who was responsible.
Seek officially recognized advice.
maybe the whiplash claim will clear for the stealing fine u greedy b******
He is entitled to claim as the accident is completely seperate from the arrest - he would expected get about lb1500 which would be held by the Court Funds Office until he reach 18.
I would say that although 98% of whiplash injuries clear up with surrounded by one year (gp said when I had an accident) it can and has surrounded by my case caused more problems.
I one-sidedly think that if you want to teach him a lesson you should claim the compensation, and craft him give it to a charity who help the victims of crime.
off course you can claim ask the police for the name of the insurance company they use. cut and dried suitcase I should think
Most people are focusing on your son's arrest and making moral judgments on that as absolution for whiplash. That's just not the law works. He be a passenger in a vehicle that was surrounded by an accident. He was injured. He have a right to compensation from whichever driver was at fault. If he be convicted of stealing the dvd, he might have been fined or detained, but he wouldn't not hold been sentenced to a whiplash. These two events are not related. Your should see a solicitor/barrister. (I'm an American attorney and am not positive whether a solicitor or barrister would manipulate this. Your system is a bit unclear to me.)
It would depend if the driver of the van be negligent or the accident be casued by an unforseeable intervening force that was not the driver's fault. If the driver be at fault, you could sue as guardian ad litem on behalf of your son, but technically the damages would be your son's damages, not yours. You can see a solicitor, but get sure his injuries are enough that it is worth it. (It sounds like you are contained by England or Canada by using solicitor, so medical expenses wouldn't be damages) But if his neck was injured that could be serious or a moment ago a strain. I guess it's up to you depending on your son's injuries.
The other side might try and argue that because of your son's crime, the the driver had to transport him, and therefore the root he got in the quirk. That doesn't give them the freedom to drive negligently though, so it will all boil down to who's more at slate for causing the accident.
There are cases where on earth in high speed police chases that resulted surrounded by accident and someone was hurt or kill by a police car, the criminal was sued because they cause the chase - but your case is different because they already had him within custody. Source(s): American law student
I think we the public should be able to sue you for bringing up a child that thieve.
You should be locked up.
With all due respect, I suggest it would be completely unethical for you to do so--and you probably don't have a crust that would stand up in court.
Your son needs to swot up responsibility, and he is only going to learn it through your arrangements.
Put yourself in the place of the police officer. He was basically doing his job, and he certainly did not be set to for your son to get injured. In fact, he is sworn to protect populace from getting hurt. If he could not have foreseen it and did not intend it, should he be penalized for doing his available job? I think doing so would be irresponsible.
He can claim compensation for his injury the money would not be yours. I think he would get around lb1500, which isn't really alot contained by the big scheme of things. What kind of an example would you be setting him by helping draw from a large cash reward for breaking the directive. He'll assume you think what he did is acceptable and do it again. You should in recent times tell he got what he deserved, which is true.
You will not get any money from a lawsuit because whiplash will go away contained by a few days. The only thing you can do is ask for them to money for the doctor visit. As a parent you should whos him a good example by letting him know it would never hold happened if he didn't steal. Karma came pay for and got him.
Legally you can claim on his behalf as he is under age, but morally should you, I don't mull over so.
Yes, you can sue on his behalf. However, any settlement may be held in trust until he reach majority.
put it down to experience.insurance companies penalise the rest of us when people claim for these frivilous alleged injuries! a sore neck?? - agree to it be a lesson to him for stealing!
Personally, providing his injury isn't serious I surmise a few days neck ache will serve as punishment, and a well brought-up reminder not to steal.
Like so many others you will probably chase the ambulance and want compensation in this day and age. Legally you own a claim, morally you must decide.
Related Questions:
I have need of direction from someone who know almost how employer insurance company settles claims for physical injury?
Injury compensation claim?
Can i claim for my injury?
When a solicitor is working a personnal injury claim, can a claim for loss of equity be made seperately- by me
Which discovery tool would be especially appropriate to use against a plaintiff claiming physical injuries.?
On the way to the station the police van was involved surrounded by an accident, when we were allowed to see him some time subsequent he said he was ok,just a bit shaken up. The subsequent day his neck be stiff and sore so we took him to the hospital and he has whiplash.
Now i realise he shouldnt of been stealing, and if he hadnt he wouldnt of get hurt, but the fact is he made a stupid mistake(he has never be in trouble before) and i am wondering if i should just put it down to experience or see a solicitor.
what do you deliberate?
Answers:
The stealing is a separate matter, so I don't fathom out why many feel the want to bring it up.
We have all stolen something at one time or another, even if its a short time ago a rubber-band or Biro from the office.
You have a lawful claim either from the police or the other driver dependant on who was responsible.
Seek officially recognized advice.
maybe the whiplash claim will clear for the stealing fine u greedy b******
He is entitled to claim as the accident is completely seperate from the arrest - he would expected get about lb1500 which would be held by the Court Funds Office until he reach 18.
I would say that although 98% of whiplash injuries clear up with surrounded by one year (gp said when I had an accident) it can and has surrounded by my case caused more problems.
I one-sidedly think that if you want to teach him a lesson you should claim the compensation, and craft him give it to a charity who help the victims of crime.
off course you can claim ask the police for the name of the insurance company they use. cut and dried suitcase I should think
Most people are focusing on your son's arrest and making moral judgments on that as absolution for whiplash. That's just not the law works. He be a passenger in a vehicle that was surrounded by an accident. He was injured. He have a right to compensation from whichever driver was at fault. If he be convicted of stealing the dvd, he might have been fined or detained, but he wouldn't not hold been sentenced to a whiplash. These two events are not related. Your should see a solicitor/barrister. (I'm an American attorney and am not positive whether a solicitor or barrister would manipulate this. Your system is a bit unclear to me.)
It would depend if the driver of the van be negligent or the accident be casued by an unforseeable intervening force that was not the driver's fault. If the driver be at fault, you could sue as guardian ad litem on behalf of your son, but technically the damages would be your son's damages, not yours. You can see a solicitor, but get sure his injuries are enough that it is worth it. (It sounds like you are contained by England or Canada by using solicitor, so medical expenses wouldn't be damages) But if his neck was injured that could be serious or a moment ago a strain. I guess it's up to you depending on your son's injuries.
The other side might try and argue that because of your son's crime, the the driver had to transport him, and therefore the root he got in the quirk. That doesn't give them the freedom to drive negligently though, so it will all boil down to who's more at slate for causing the accident.
There are cases where on earth in high speed police chases that resulted surrounded by accident and someone was hurt or kill by a police car, the criminal was sued because they cause the chase - but your case is different because they already had him within custody. Source(s): American law student
I think we the public should be able to sue you for bringing up a child that thieve.
You should be locked up.
With all due respect, I suggest it would be completely unethical for you to do so--and you probably don't have a crust that would stand up in court.
Your son needs to swot up responsibility, and he is only going to learn it through your arrangements.
Put yourself in the place of the police officer. He was basically doing his job, and he certainly did not be set to for your son to get injured. In fact, he is sworn to protect populace from getting hurt. If he could not have foreseen it and did not intend it, should he be penalized for doing his available job? I think doing so would be irresponsible.
He can claim compensation for his injury the money would not be yours. I think he would get around lb1500, which isn't really alot contained by the big scheme of things. What kind of an example would you be setting him by helping draw from a large cash reward for breaking the directive. He'll assume you think what he did is acceptable and do it again. You should in recent times tell he got what he deserved, which is true.
You will not get any money from a lawsuit because whiplash will go away contained by a few days. The only thing you can do is ask for them to money for the doctor visit. As a parent you should whos him a good example by letting him know it would never hold happened if he didn't steal. Karma came pay for and got him.
Legally you can claim on his behalf as he is under age, but morally should you, I don't mull over so.
Yes, you can sue on his behalf. However, any settlement may be held in trust until he reach majority.
put it down to experience.insurance companies penalise the rest of us when people claim for these frivilous alleged injuries! a sore neck?? - agree to it be a lesson to him for stealing!
Personally, providing his injury isn't serious I surmise a few days neck ache will serve as punishment, and a well brought-up reminder not to steal.
Like so many others you will probably chase the ambulance and want compensation in this day and age. Legally you own a claim, morally you must decide.
Related Questions: