Would you to some extent be a advocate or an economist?
Answers:
I'll give you the answer of a tangible economist. "It depends".
An economist because I wouldn't have the conscience to uphold someone who may be guilty. I know we are all guilty of something, but I could put myself into feeling more guilty. Or, worse however, prosecute someone who might be innocent.
An economist seems better because all you own to be is a nerd. As a lawyer you hold to be a nerd and perhaps a fraud. IF you tell the truth about the cutback and it tanks, oh well, it be gonna tank anyway and I wouldn't have done anything to end in the tank.
Lol, both would be great. I have already been an assistant CFO and help in a case surrounded by corperate law.
Economist -- already enjoy maths (I'm a Financial Manager and Cost Estimator), and I have ethics -- which rules out me going into the Legal Profession!
Lawyer. There are probably more career option, (the law is involved in everything) and despite the glum stereotypes, it is still one of the most respected professions out there.
shoot me if i ever become either.
neither. ego rather be a journalist or surrounded by PR
lawyer
Name some rich and famous economists, I'd to some extent enjoy the challenge of arguing and it's rewards that effects peoples lives and pays okay.
Personally, a lawyer because I am very analytical and can`t bear mathematics...something a successful economist would have to be fluent beside
Related Questions: