Calling adjectives Malpractice Lawyers!?
O.K so here's the story, I have a lil nephew, who's had 2 circumcisions, 1 at merely a few days old & the sencond one at around 1. The reason for the 2nd one, be that the pediatrician thought the 1st one had been done wrong & it needed to be corrected. So the 2nd one be done by a Pediatric surgeon - not a urologist. Any how even after the second one I could tell things didn't look quite right - but I didn't want to alarm the mom, so I stayed out of it. She transfer pediatricians and they told her, that he still looked uncircumsiced and that he needed to be circumcised for a 3rd time - now he's 3. Luckily this time they were advise by a urologist who told them that the child had an inverted penis, that was never diagnosed & that the two previous circumsions, hurt him, more than they help him. Now this poor little baby, will have to put up with surgery to correct this problem, n because so much skin has already been removed, is going to acquire a bit complicated. So is there a lawsuit here?
Answers:
That's crazy. Why are inhabitants so ignorant and bent on messing with make-up?
Unless it's clear the doctors were negligent and should own noticed he had an inverted penis consequently I doubt there's a case.
The mother should ring Legal Aid (in some places they give free phone advice) or set up a discussion with a "no win no fee" lawyer to see what they read aloud.
However it's possible the child could sue once he's over 18, for all the harm done to him unnecessarily, at hand are some cases with males trying to sue their circumcisers (just after one circumcision).
I take it the insurance company has no problems even so with the procedures or the number of them? I take it the first be done in office by the urologist? This is already dire alarming for the birth mom. I would get some information from an attorney first if he/she is willing to pinch the case before bringing it to the mother. Second have any of this been done in a hospital? If so hold these issues and concerns been brought up to the risk manager or tolerant advocate persons? At lowest possible get the hospital's opinion as a event of record too. Only an attorney with "adjectives the facts"can give you the best opinion.
Yes, BUT... since not one but two doctors thought they were looking at like peas in a pod thing, it would be tough to prove malpractice. You are looking at a long road to take this to court beside lots of expense for expert testimony. Contact a personal injury lawyer first, speak about them what you have, and if he does not do medical malpractice ask him to recommend a firm that would look the case over and evaluate it's likelihood. Source(s): I'm a civil suit investigator.
Sorry, there's no malpractice from what I can see.
Your nephew's mother signed her son up for elective cosmetic surgery not once, but twice and presently she's worried about there not one enough skin to do reconstructive surgery. That's too bad. If she hadn't have him cut in the first place, they wouldn't be in this situation.
Not from the few facts you presented.
Related Questions:
Aside from lawyer,who else can be sued for malpractice?
Is in attendance such a item as legalized malpractice. My attorney screwed my divorce and cost me stress and money?
Medical malpractice , necessitate direction , attorney , doctors?
How do you find a lawyer malpractice insurance company?
How could if find a advocate that specializes surrounded by medical malpractice, within pernickety instruments that slipshod.?
Answers:
That's crazy. Why are inhabitants so ignorant and bent on messing with make-up?
Unless it's clear the doctors were negligent and should own noticed he had an inverted penis consequently I doubt there's a case.
The mother should ring Legal Aid (in some places they give free phone advice) or set up a discussion with a "no win no fee" lawyer to see what they read aloud.
However it's possible the child could sue once he's over 18, for all the harm done to him unnecessarily, at hand are some cases with males trying to sue their circumcisers (just after one circumcision).
I take it the insurance company has no problems even so with the procedures or the number of them? I take it the first be done in office by the urologist? This is already dire alarming for the birth mom. I would get some information from an attorney first if he/she is willing to pinch the case before bringing it to the mother. Second have any of this been done in a hospital? If so hold these issues and concerns been brought up to the risk manager or tolerant advocate persons? At lowest possible get the hospital's opinion as a event of record too. Only an attorney with "adjectives the facts"can give you the best opinion.
Yes, BUT... since not one but two doctors thought they were looking at like peas in a pod thing, it would be tough to prove malpractice. You are looking at a long road to take this to court beside lots of expense for expert testimony. Contact a personal injury lawyer first, speak about them what you have, and if he does not do medical malpractice ask him to recommend a firm that would look the case over and evaluate it's likelihood. Source(s): I'm a civil suit investigator.
Sorry, there's no malpractice from what I can see.
Your nephew's mother signed her son up for elective cosmetic surgery not once, but twice and presently she's worried about there not one enough skin to do reconstructive surgery. That's too bad. If she hadn't have him cut in the first place, they wouldn't be in this situation.
Not from the few facts you presented.
Related Questions: