Can a railway company exclude liability for personal injury when a woman slips and sprains her ankle on the?
train even though there are warning signs on the outside of the train by the entrance and within the back of the seat within front of her. The signs express that the floor of the train can get slippery at times and to take perfectionism, they also express that they cannot be liable for any personal injury caused. Note** When the woman slips over she has NOT formed a contract near the train company.
Answers:
why would the train company be liable, near are signs to warn that person and accident happen, god taxpayers subsidise rail travel satisfactory, why the need for silly payouts too!
It is impossible for them to adopt liability due to the fact that they have stated that accident can and may happen on this train and from boarding the train and either buying the ticket or though mortal there of her own accord she accept full liability.
This is the way the government works, if they state that accident may happen and that they are not liable, no claims can be made.
It is still her fault and it will be as long as those signs be available to see and the terms were written somewhere contained by the station.
yes
if she slipped because near was say precipitation water on the floor, how can you expect the train company to be liable for that? you cannot reasonably expect the train company to hold on to a cleaner on board to mop up wet floors, can you.
Why would she want to hold them responsible? They have clearly posted warnings and if she didn't read them and bring them into consideration that is clearly her own stupidity at work. That would be like tripping on the sidewalk and getting hurt. What are you going to hold the city responsible? No.
If there are signs surrounded by place stating her liability rights then no
Of course they can.
It is the womans fault for not taking care when using the service.
Why should the railway company be liable for peoples stupidity??
Related Questions:
In NJ, I own a personal injury lawsuit next...?
Auto Accident Personal Injury Claim, how much is it worth out of court?
Personal Injury claim. What is likely to ask for within compensation?
Accident Personal Injury Claim ?
Are wrongful release cases harder to win settlements for than personal injury cases?
Answers:
why would the train company be liable, near are signs to warn that person and accident happen, god taxpayers subsidise rail travel satisfactory, why the need for silly payouts too!
It is impossible for them to adopt liability due to the fact that they have stated that accident can and may happen on this train and from boarding the train and either buying the ticket or though mortal there of her own accord she accept full liability.
This is the way the government works, if they state that accident may happen and that they are not liable, no claims can be made.
It is still her fault and it will be as long as those signs be available to see and the terms were written somewhere contained by the station.
yes
if she slipped because near was say precipitation water on the floor, how can you expect the train company to be liable for that? you cannot reasonably expect the train company to hold on to a cleaner on board to mop up wet floors, can you.
Why would she want to hold them responsible? They have clearly posted warnings and if she didn't read them and bring them into consideration that is clearly her own stupidity at work. That would be like tripping on the sidewalk and getting hurt. What are you going to hold the city responsible? No.
If there are signs surrounded by place stating her liability rights then no
Of course they can.
It is the womans fault for not taking care when using the service.
Why should the railway company be liable for peoples stupidity??
Related Questions: